China's economic engine is not Beijing picking winners but thousands of city governments competing like venture capitalists, where promotion depends on how many companies a mayor lands.
A mayor is really a venture partner
Hefei, Wuhu and Ningde do something the West finds hard to imagine: the government buys equity directly. In 2008 Hefei handed nearly a tenth of its annual revenue to a struggling display maker, BOE, taking an 81 percent stake in the joint venture.
That bet paid off. BOE is now the world's largest display panel maker, producing about a quarter of all smartphone screens. Hefei went on to back carmaker NIO and memory chip firm CXMT the same way, investing roughly $25 billion over a decade for reported earnings near $9 billion.
Why would a mayor gamble like this? Because promotions are scored on the local economy. Cities keep most of the money they raise, and a cadre who delivers fast growth is far more likely to be promoted; one who fails may face early retirement.
How far cities will go
To land Tesla in Shanghai, the city gave nearly $289 million in grants, arranged $2.2 billion in low-interest loans, cut corporate tax, and halved the price of 86 hectares of land. One minister reportedly complained Shanghai gave away everything and Tesla did not have to spend a penny.
Musk thought the factory would take two years. Shanghai promised one. The deal was signed in July 2018, construction began in January 2019, and cars rolled off the line that December — twice as fast as retooling Tesla's Fremont plant, three times faster than the Berlin gigafactory.
Kunshan, once the poorest of its region's six districts, secretly started an industrial zone in the 1980s and courted Taiwanese electronics firms with comic enthusiasm: a Taiwanese school, forty Taiwanese TV channels, dirt-cheap land. By the late 2000s it made half the world's laptops.
Where the money comes from, and the price
These local machines run on household savings. Ordinary Chinese can move at most $50,000 abroad a year, and with few alternatives the money sits in banks at capped interest rates. Savers earn almost nothing; companies borrow almost for free.
The side effect is brutal overcapacity. China's car industry could build 55.5 million vehicles in 2024 but used half that capacity, while Western plants typically run above 80 percent. Even BYD's profit margin has fallen to a meager 4 percent.
The same machine ran in America in the 1950s and 1960s. Mayors in Chicago, New York and Atlanta used land values and tolls to build infrastructure and fight for airports, laying 310,000 miles of local roads between 1950 and 1970. What makes China unusual is that its version never stopped running.
In one line: China's miracle is not a new model. It is the West's old one, which the West threw away.
Why it matters
Cities fighting each other for growth upgrades industry astonishingly fast and overbuilds just as fast. That framing is more useful than arguing 'state versus market': what matters is what sits on an official's scorecard, not who is in the room.
Curated from high-quality sources, with concise summaries and key takeaways.
